Dear Jack,

With the coming election, I’m sure you are reading all the polls with great interest. So, I imagine you know, better that most, that in the most recent poll on Canada’s military intevention is Afghanistan (July 10, 2008), 58% disagreed with the decision to keep fighting until 2011. The percentage of Canadians supporting the war (36%), has declined, and corresponds with the level of Tory support reported by Ipsos Canada on August 19.

Support for the Liberals (30%) and the NDP (14%) was unchanged, while the Green party polled 10%, down from 11%, according to Reuters.

I’m not sure where the Bloc Quebecois figures in this latest poll, but other polls put them nationally at 8% and make them the clear leader in Quebec, where they have polled 30% to 40% throughout 2008.

Sadly, if the outcome of the expected election corresponds to polling numbers, the pro-war parties (Liberals, Conservatives) will prevail and the Canadian misadventure (I’m overly kind here — strike that — the Canadian crime against humanity) in Afghanistan will continue unchecked.

Earlier this year the Tories and the Libs voted to extend the war to 2011. To their credit, the NDP and the Bloc voted against this motion. The NDP has long called for withdrawal of our troops. Goodonya!

Shamefully, the Greens probably would have voted with the majority in Parliament if they could have. The Green Policy on Afghanistan is a hopelessly naive, goody two-shoes piece of drivel; it’s clear they do not understand that the invasion was driven by American strategic interests and that ANY continued Canadian military involvement is criminal.

Jack, for those of us who oppose the war, the projected outcome of the election is depressing. Our tax dollars and our soldiers will continue to kill thousands of Afghans; our troops will continue to come home dead, injured, and psychologically damaged. Grieving families will suffer for decades. Billions of dollars will be diverted from Canada’s social programs. There will be no winners.

It does not have to be this way. But for things to change, Canadians will have to set aside some bad habits, such as voting Liberal because they can’t stand the Tories and the NDP. Canucks of the Green persuasion will have to ask themselves whether Canadian complicity in imperialism, however compassionately expressed, really reflects their values.

For this to happen, the NDP has to put the war on the front-burner.

That is where you come in, Jack. The war is a hot-button issue, but you would never know it when you visit the federal NDP homepage. A casual visitor could be forgiven for thinking the NDP’s top priorities are text messaging, Facebook and Flickr. While the party is on record as opposing the war, you have to search to find anything substantial.

Afghanistan is THE defining issue in the coming election, Jack. You need to remember that and hammer the point home at every opportunity.

Don’t be bashful, Jack. The majority of Canadians are with you on this one.

Promise to bring our troops home, now. Promise to work for peace in Afghanistan and around the world. Promise to channel humanitarian aid to Afghanistan that doesn’t support the Karzai gang. Promise to invest serious dollars in supporting the soldiers and families in Canada who have been destroyed by this war. Promise to end this disaster before it grows even larger.

These are dangerous times, Jack. I’m with you on the environment, but I fear a nuclear war more.  Pull Canada’s navy out of the Arabian sea. Denounce the “war on terror” for the sham that it is. Oppose the plans for war with Iran. Canada has to take a stand against militarism and for peace, and you can make it happen. You must.

For all of our sakes, don’t let us down.

Sincerely,

Paul Graham
Winnipeg, MB

Sgt. Shawn Eades, Cpl. Dustin Roy Robert Joseph Wasden and Sapper Stephan John Stock were killed by an IED on Thu. Aug. 21, 2008.

Sgt. Shawn Eades, Cpl. Dustin Roy Robert Joseph Wasden and Sapper Stephan John Stock were killed by an IED on Thursday, August 21, 2008. Their deaths bring to 93 the number of Canadian soldiers killed in Afghanistan. As is their custom, Canada’s political leaders wrapped their corpses in bloody lies and tired platitudes.

“Today, all of Canada mourns the deaths of three brave soldiers killed in the line of duty in Afghanistan,” Prime Minister Stephen Harper said in a statement. “These soldiers made an important contribution to international efforts in Afghanistan aimed at creating the conditions necessary for reconstruction and development efforts to flourish in a country ravaged by decades of war and despotism.”

“Canada and our NATO allies are making a profound difference in the lives of the Afghan people,” Defence Minister Peter MacKay also said in a statement Thursday. “Despite this tragic event, we remain undeterred in our mission to help Afghans rebuild their country.”

Bullshit!

What a load of crap! Their deaths will do nothing to repair the ravages of “decades of war and despotism.” If anything, the war will only prolong it.

These soldiers (and the people they kill) are being sacrificed to shore up an irredeemably feudal, reactionary government of warlords and drug runners who are every bit as nasty as the Taliban regime they replaced.

Apologists for the war insist that the NATO forces are making a positive difference in the lives of ordinary Afghans. They remind us that the government of Hamid Karzai was elected, that girls are being allowed to go to school, that life is getting better.

Read some of these stories and explain, please, how Afghan life is improving.

  • August 24, 2008

    New York Times: President Hamid Karzai strongly condemned on Saturday a coalition airstrike that he said killed up to 95 Afghans — including 50 children — in a village in western Afghanistan on Friday, and said his government would be announcing measures to prevent the loss of civilian life in the future.      more…
  • August 23, 2008

    PAN: Afghan National Army opened fire on angry protesters who were protesting the killing of dozens of civilians in the US bombardment in Shindand district of western Herat province. Hundreds of civilians came out in streets of Azizabad city.      more…
  • August 22, 2008

    Telegraph.co.uk: US-led coalition forces killed 76 civilians – including 50 women and 19 children – in a military operation yesterday, the Afghan government said. The attack, which included air strikes, took place in the Shindand district of Herat province in the west of Afghanistan and an investigation is now underway, its interior ministry said in a statement.      more…
  • August 20, 2008

    PAN: At least 17 civilians including women were killed during a NATO-led International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) raid in mountainous areas of Mahtarlam capital of eastern Laghman province, local elders complained Wednesday.      more…
  • August 17, 2008

    Reuters: British troops accidentally killed four civilians and wounded three others with rockets during an operation against Taliban insurgents in southern Afghanistan, NATO and British officials said Sunday.      more…
  • August 11, 2008

    AFP: Eight civilians being held in a compound by Taliban militants were killed in an air strike by US-led troops during a battle that also left 25 rebel fighters dead, the force said Monday. “Survivors reported that coalition aircraft dropped a bomb on the enemy position which killed eight of the civilians.”      more…

PAN: 50 civilians were killed and many residential houses were destroyed on Wednesday night in coalition air strike in Shindand district of western Herat province. The young boy who wounded in the bombardment. (Photo: PAJHWOK/Ahmad Quraishi)

PAN: 50 civilians were killed and many residential houses were destroyed on Wednesday night in coalition air strike in Shindand district of western Herat province. The young boy who wounded in the bombardment. (Photo: PAJHWOK/Ahmad Quraishi)

The Canadian government, when it gets around to admitting that we kill civilians, will issue regrets, remind us that the Taliban terrorists kill civilians all the time and even pay compensation. Reporting in the National Post earlier this year, Tom Blackwell wrote:

The federal government has paid out tens of thousands of dollars in compensation to Afghans who have been hurt, killed or had property wrecked by Canadian troops in the past two years, internal documents obtained by the National Post indicate.

The list of reparations paid by the middle of last year includes five cases of civilians injured or killed at the hands of Canadian troops and three friendly-fire deaths of Afghan soldiers or police.

Compensation for deaths ranged from about $2,000 to almost $9,000, according to Justice Department claims reports, obtained under the Access to Information Act but censored of much personal and other information. None of the claims dealt with damage from air strikes called in by Canadian troops.

Apologists will sigh that civilian casualties are regrettable but unavoidable aspect of war, but that we’ve got to keep our eyes on the prize: a free and democratic Afghanistan where the current horrors will be justified by future happy outcomes.

Afghans aren’t impressed by this. Here is what the Revolutionary Association of Women of Afghanistan had to say, March 8, 2008, about the current regime:

The true nature of the US “war on terror” drama has been exposed today and we witness that they are killing thousands of our innocent people under the name of “fighting terrorists” while on the other hand they are busy in dealing with the barbaric fascist Taliban trying to gloss some of them as “moderates” in order to share power with them. These treacherous acts of demagogy have revealed it once again to our people and to the world that the US government and its allies were just pursuing their strategic, economic and political gains in Afghanistan and pushing our people to increasing destitution and disasters. Installing the “Northern Alliance” brutal warlords on power and changing Afghanistan into the center of the world drug mafia, have been the first and foremost objectives of their wrong policies.

RAWA from the very first days stated that no country will grant freedom and democracy to another country and today this reality is evident to all. The US disguised the dead rats of yesterday with suits and ties thus released them like wild wolves on our people and are doing nothing about the current crimes, violation of human rights, looting of millions dollars of aid by warlords and corrupt NGOs. If the billions of dollars of aid directed in the name of reconstruction were not poured in the pockets of criminals in the parliament and cabinet, natural hazards like freezing winter would have not taken so many lives today. Even if a small portion of that money was spent for the relief of people, the life conditions of our miserable people, particularly women would have not been so tragic.

RAWA has been fighting for human rights in Afghanistan since 1977. They want us to leave so the people of Afghanistan can solve their own problems, free of foreign interference. They know the danger they face and they believe we are only making matters worse. We should listen to them.

Still not convinced?

Still not convinced? Well, here are some more stories that show what RAWA is fighting and what our soldiers are dying to maintain.

  • Blaming the victim: Abused Afghan women often end up in jail: “Trafficked across the border from Pakistan with her 3-year-old son, Rukhma was handed to an Afghan who raped and abused her, then beat the toddler to death as she watched helplessly. He was jailed for 20 years for murder, but Rukhma . . . was given a four-year sentence on Dec. 5 for adultery and “escaping her house” in Pakistan, even though she says she was kidnapped and raped. The fall of the Taliban six years ago heralded new rights for Afghan women: to go to school or get a job, and be protected under the law. Women’s rights are now enshrined in the constitution. Yet except for a small urban elite, a woman fleeing domestic violence or accusing a man of rape herself often ends up the guilty party in the eyes of judges and prosecutors.”
  • The Afghan women jailed for being victims of rape: “. . . the teenager had been married at a young age to an abusive husband and ran away with a boy from her neighbourhood . . . Ostracised from her family and village, Saliha was convicted of escaping from home and illegal sexual relations. The first carries a maximum penalty of 10 years, the second 20. These are two of the most common accusations facing female prisoners in Afghanistan. Two-thirds of the women in Lashkar Gah’s medieval-looking jail have been convicted of illegal sexual relations, but most are simply rape victims – mirroring the situation nationwide. The system does not distinguish between those who have been attacked and those who have chosen to run off with a man.”
  • Childhood ends at 11 for some Afghan girls; for others, an education begins:” . . . Girls as young as 11 are considered just old enough for a husband. Their parents collect lucrative $10,000 dowries from wealthy grooms-to-be, and these pre-teens are sent off to become housewives and start raising families. Last year 60 Kandahar girls sought to escape their fate through suicide, provincial officials say. Like Sher, many wound up as hospital burn victims after dousing themselves with gasoline and setting themselves ablaze . . .”

Shahnaz,14, sits on the floor of her family home November 17, 2006 in Herat, Afghanistan. She tried to commit suicide a year ago practically crippling herself from the severe burns after her father lost her in a gambling match. She spent a year in the Herat hospital. The medical staff at the Herat hospital says that they have registered around 700 self-immolation cases so far this year. (Photo by Paula Bronstein)

Shahnaz,14, sits on the floor of her family home November 17, 2006 in Herat, Afghanistan. She tried to commit suicide a year ago practically crippling herself from the severe burns after her father lost her in a gambling match. She spent a year in the Herat hospital. The medical staff at the Herat hospital says that they have registered around 700 self-immolation cases so far this year. (Photo by Paula Bronstein)

Do something useful

RAWA wants us to leave — not because they support the Taliban — they clearly do not. They want us to leave because we are not helping Afghans; worse, we are an obstacle to them solving their numerous problems.

RAWA operates schools, orphanages, a hospital and a health clinic. Canadians who truly want to help should demand that Canada withdraw its military and provide financial support to an organization that truly works for human rights and women’s liberation in Afghanistan. And given that it is unlikely that the Canadian government is prepared to do so, we should send financial support directly to RAWA for their humanitarian programs.

Please respond to this appeal, just in, from Eric Lee at Labour Start:

Iranian labour activists Sousan Razani and Shiva Kheirabadi.A few days ago I wrote to tell you about the increased repression directed against Iranian labour activists.

I told you about the case of two women in particular, Sousan Razani and Shiva Kheirabadi (at left), who have been sentenced to jail terms and whipping for the “crime” of having participated in a May Day demonstration this year.

I told you that Sousan was sentenced to receive 15 lashes and 4 months in prison.

We have now received the shocking news that it is actually worse than that.

Sousan has been ordered to receive 9 months in prison and 70 lashes.

In the last few days we have received photographs of Sousan and Shiva. I wish that every trade unionist, every person who cares about human rights, could look at those photographs today. You can see them on our campaign page: http://www.labourstart.org/iran

The campaign that we launched is now running in an unprecedented ten languages, with more to come. And so far, 3,448 people have sent off messages to the Iranian government.

This is not enough.

We must all redouble our efforts in the next few days to prevent this barbaric sentence from being carried out, to prevent the execution of the teacher Farzad Kamangar, and to push for the release of all jailed worker activists in Iran.

I know that there are 50,000 of you reading this message who have not yet sent off your protests. Please do not wait – go here now: http://www.labourstart.org/iran

For those of you who already did send off your message, thank you — but please do more.

Please pass this message on. Help us mobilize thousands more trade unionists in support of our sisters and brothers in Iranian jails.

If you are on Facebook, make sure to sign up to our cause – and sign up your Facebook friends, here:
http://apps.facebook.com/causes/110025

August is a very difficult time to mobilize people. Many who would ordinarily be supporting this campaign are away on holiday. That’s why it’s so important that if you are reading this message, you act now.

Sousan and Shiva need our help. Let’s not fail them.

Thank you.

Eric Lee


Labour Start campaigns are featured on this page, in the right hand column, under “Campaigns.” Please check it regularly and take action. Better yet, get yourself on Eric’s mailing list, which you can do by selecting that option when you participate in any of his campaigns. An act of solidarity is just a click away.

Hypocritic Oafs

Posted: August 15, 2008 in Uncategorized

Today, Stephen Harper gave Vladimir Putin some advice that he, himself, ought to follow. Said Harper:

“We do call on Russia to respect the territorial integrity of Georgia. I am deeply troubled by a notion I see developing in Russia, and that is a notion that Russia somehow has a say or some control over countries outside of its borders.”

Perhaps he was taking his cue from his mentor, George Bush, who today said: “Bullying and intimidation are not acceptable ways to conduct foreign policy in the 21st Century.”

Perhaps these gents would agree with Adolf Hitler that “in the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility.”

If you are an American who relies on US mainstream media reports for your world view, you might be forgiven for not knowing that Russia’s “invasion” of Georgia is a response to Georgian attacks on South Ossetia which began late last Thursday night. If you are a Canadian, the news stories are a liitle more balanced, but you still have to dig and read between the lines.

It’s complicated, but alternative and authoritative information and analysis can be found. A good place to start is Global Research, which has been doing a good job on following this issue as it unfolds.

There are signs Canadians are learning not to take what these hypocritic(al) oafs have to say at face value. Someone named Jaik, just today, responded to a blog post on Gary Doer’s support for the war in Afghanistan with this comment: “Wow. This is very disturbing and has prompted me to withdraw my monthly financial support of the provinical NDP.”

More broadly, a growing majority of Canadians are opposed to Canadian military action in Afghanistan. Below are some numbers from an Angus Reid poll done in July.

Angus Reid Poll: July 10, 2008

“As you may know, the House of Commons has authorized an extension of Canada’s mission in Afghanistan until the end of 2011, which is conditional on Canada coming up with unmanned aerial vehicles and transport helicopters, and NATO providing an additional 1,000 troops in the south. Do you agree or disagree with the decision to extend Canada’s mission in Afghanistan until the end of 2011?”

Jul. 2008 May 2008 Mar. 2008
Agree 36% 41% 37%
Disagree 58% 54% 58%
Not sure 6% 6% 5%

We shouldn’t underestimate the difficulty we face in reorienting Canada’s foreign policy from one of war making to peace building. The coming federal election will present some opportunities for debate, but given the pro-war position of the Liberal and Conservative parties, and the relative weakness of the anti-war NDP, we can’t count on the election to bring about quick changes.

That said, Canadians have shown themselves to be peace loving and that is a good foundation on which to build.

Taliban insurgents killed three humanitarian aid workers and their driver yesterday in an attack that is being condemned, rightfully, as murder.

Dead are two Canadians, Jacqueline Kirk (left) and Shirley Case, an American, Nicole Dial and an Afghan, Mohammad Aimal.

By all accounts, they were decent, loving people who didn’t deserve what was done to them.

Prime Minister Harper expressed the feelings of many when he said during a visit to eastern Newfoundland: “I want to first of all express my condolences to the families of these murdered humanitarian workers. This is obviously an outrage, a terribly brutal act, which I think should remind everybody of the brutality of the Taliban and the danger that everybody there faces — not just military people but all those who are there trying to help rebuild this country.”

I’m sure Harper is sincere, and that he never stopped once to wonder why Afghanistan needs rebuilding. I also suspect he never once considered what responsibility he might bear for the deaths of civilians and combatants on both sides of this conflict.

I suspect this of our Prime Minister because I don’t recall a time when he has publically expressed sympathy for any of the unarmed men, women and children killed by Canadian and other NATO soldiers over the past seven years.

Perhaps he has, and I missed it. On the other hand, perhaps he is unaware and just needs to be reminded. Well, given that he doesn’t have time to read my blog, maybe someone can pass it along to him. Better yet, pass along the Open Letter that Peace Alliance Winnipeg sent to Gary Doer this week; it has the stats I am going to quote below, and much much more.

Afghan Death Toll

The precise number of Afghans killed since 2001 is difficult to determine, but is safe to assume that tens of thousands have died needlessly.

  • Writing in The Guardian in 2002, Johnathan Steele suggested that up to 8,000 direct deaths and 20,000 indirect deaths could be attributed to the invasion. The American Project on Defense Alternatives, which speaks of “adapting military policy to the opportunities of the new era”, puts the 2001-02 civilian death toll much lower, between 1,000 and 1,300.
  • Dr. Marc W. Herold, of the University of New Hampshire, has estimated that American bombing had killed between 3,100 and 3,600 civilians by Oct, 2003.
  • According to Agence France Presse, about 1,700 people were killed in 2005, “many of them militants.” A report by Human Rights Watch said that 4,400 Afghans had been killed in 2006, more than 1,000 of them civilians. Some 2,077 militants were killed in Coalition operations between September 1 and December 13, 2006.
  • More than 7,580 people were killed in 2007, including: 1,980 civilians, 926 Afghan policemen and 4,478 militants.
  • To date, in 2008, about 2,700 Afghans have been killed, including 960 civilians.

The Peace Alliance notes: “Let us not forget that Canadians are active participants in the killing of Afghan civilians as well as combatants. Reported civilian deaths include a taxi driver, a 10-year old boy, an elderly motorcyclist, two young children (aged 2 and 4, a young motorcyclist and his baby brother, an Afghan National Police officer and a homeless beggar, a Toyota driver, a taxi passenger, and a motorist. Given the obvious limitations on reporting in a war zone, this likely represents the minimum number of civilians killed by Canadians.”

One of 6 civilians killed by a US bombing raid in March 2008.

Does the death of Afghan civilians justify the death international aid workers? No. But remembering them helps us get some much needed perspective. And perhaps it helps us see, more clearly, through the hypocrisy of our political leaders in a twisted world where we mourn “our” dead and fail to acknowledge the deaths of the people “our” soldiers kill.

Canadians will continue to join Afghans in violent death until we compel our government to withdraw Canadian troops and work for international peace.

Let us pause to mourn the war dead of all nations. You can get acquainted with some of these victims by visiting the Afghan Victim Memorial Project.

And then, let’s get to work on building peace.

Dear Premier Doer,

We write to ask you to remove the “Yellow Ribbon Garden” from the grounds of the Manitoba Legislature and to refrain from lending provincial support to the “Red Shirt Rally” planned for August 15, 2008 on the grounds of the Manitoba Legislature.

We do so because the “Yellow Ribbon” and “Red Friday” campaigns in Canada signify support for militarism and war. They do so under the guise of caring and compassion for “our troops.” But in reality, these campaigns are code for supporting a war of aggression being carried on in the name of, and against the will of, the majority of Canadian people. (A June 2008 poll suggests that only 36 per cent of Canadians agree with Parliament’s decision to extend Canada’s military intervention in Afghanistan through 2011. That is down from 41 per cent in a similar poll done in May, according to Angus Reid Strategies. )

We object strenuously to the war in Afghanistan and to the use of Canadian soldiers in that war. In no way is the participation of Canadians in the ongoing carnage in Afghanistan supportable by informed people of conscience.

In March, you announced provincial support for the Yellow Ribbon Campaign.  You followed this up with the planting of the “Yellow Ribbon Garden” in the front of the Legislature. Most recently, you agreed to host a “Red Shirt Rally” with MLA, Bonnie Korzeniowski, Special Envoy for Military Affairs as one of the featured speakers. While you are entitled to express your personal opinion about the war (one which is diametrically opposed by the federal New Democratic Party), you do not have the right to use provincial resources to promote it.

Read more: Open Letter To Gary Doer On Afghanistan

Action: Peace Alliance Winnipeg encourages you to circulate this letter widely and to communicate with the Premier of Manitoba and Manitoba MLAs.

The Yellow Ribbon Garden in front of the Manitoba Legislature asks people to “support our troops.” This is code for “support the war” and is one of the many tactics employed to manipulate the emotions of Canadians, justifiably concerned for the safety of our soldiers, into supporting an immoral war against the Afghan people.


Originally posted at Peace Alliance Winnipeg.

Bring Khadr home, now!

Posted: July 17, 2008 in Uncategorized

Omar Khadr at age 15.The “war crime” Omar Khadr is accused of having committed at age 15, killing an American soldier, would never have happened if the US had refrained from its war crime, the invasion of Afghanistan. Sgt. Christopher Speer, the soldier he is charged with killing, would still be alive, as would 810 other foreign troops and many thousands of Afghans.

As Osgoode Hall Professor of International Law Michael Mandel wrote in the Ottawa Citizen, Mar. 17, 2008, “The war on Afghanistan was George W. Bush’s war, not the UN’s. It had no more UN authority than the war on Iraq. Both are marked by the same original sin, Nuremberg’s ‘supreme international crime’ of aggressive war.”

Omar Khadr has been shot twice in the black, blinded in one eye, tortured, and imprisoned under laws passed by the United States which contravene international law and human decency. There is credible evidence that the “evidence” against him was fabricated. He has suffered enough. Bring him home.

Resources

  • Wikipedia has an extensive and well documented article on Omar Khadr.
  • Sulman Hassan, a graduate in law from Liverpool John Moores University reviews applicable international laws and concludes that the US violated them when it invaded Afghanistan.

While only a congenital idiot would call Stephen Harper a fascist, most would label him a right winger in today’s political parlance, some derisively, others with pride.

Politically speaking, Harper is, arguably, farther right than Adolf Hitler,* if all you take into account are his economic ideas. On other significant questions, thankfully, Harper is in another universe (though I wish he would get over his apparent shared fondness for things military).

How helpful is it, then, to describe Hitler and Harper as right wingers? Or Joseph Stalin and the Dalai Lama as lefties? Not helpful at all, in my experience, and frequently a cause of political confusion.

Some clever folks at The Political Compass have come up with an alternative to the worn-out left-right paradigm that takes into an account social issues, ideas about authority, individual freedoms and so on. By completing a short, five minute questionnaire you can determine where you live on the political landscape and how you compare with what passes for political leadership today.

I tried it out and learned that instead of merely being a left winger, that I lived somewhere in the bottom left quadrant near the Dalai Lama and Nelson Mandela. How cool is that?!

Political Compass

(I also determined that my partner-in-life is a tad more authoritarian than I, though equally left-wing, I hasten to add. Ahem. So, if you involve friends, comrades and spouses in this exercise, the social learning potential is, well, interesting.)

Having taken the test and graphically illustrated my distance from Robert Mugabe (a man I once admired for his leading role in the liberation of Zimbabwe), I’m still not sure what to do with this little tool. If you have some thoughts on this, please feel free to share them here.

Grateful Acknowledgement Dept. – I found The Political Compass whilst visiting Stageleft, who I tripped over while browsing Progressive Bloggers. So, give these fine folks a visit as well.

Notes:

* Adolf Hitler’s relative position on the left-right continuum is plotted at The Political Compass, and dammit, he is farther left than Harper.

“Why, of course, the people don’t want war. Why would some poor slob on a farm want to risk his life in a war when the best that he can get out of it is to come back to his farm in one piece. Naturally, the common people don’t want war; neither in Russia nor in England nor in America, nor for that matter in Germany. That is understood. But, after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy or a fascist dictatorship or a Parliament or a Communist dictatorship . . . the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same way in any country.”

Hermann Goering, Nazi Reischsmarshall and Luftwaffe Chief

Goering was sentenced to death at the Nuremberg Tribunals for crimes against humanity, but committed suicide, just hours before his execution, on Oct. 15, 1946. Source: Snopes

“I don’t have to tell you the story, the link between Afghanistan and the attacks of 9/11, the oppression and brutality endured under the Taliban and the risk that terrorism will come home if we don’t confront it here.”

Prime Minister Stephen Harper, addressing the troops in Kandahar, Afghanistan, May 23, 2007. Source: Government of Canada

“Some have argued that confronting the threat from Iraq could detract from the war against terror. To the contrary; confronting the threat posed by Iraq is crucial to winning the war on terror. When I spoke to Congress more than a year ago, I said that those who harbor terrorists are as guilty as the terrorists themselves. Saddam Hussein is harboring terrorists and the instruments of terror, the instruments of mass death and destruction. And he cannot be trusted. The risk is simply too great that he will use them, or provide them to a terror network.”

President George W. Bush, speaking at the Cincinnati Museum Center, Oct. 7, 2002. Source: White House News Releases

“Iran is today the world’s leading state sponsor of terror. It sends hundreds of millions of dollars to extremists around the world while its own people face repression and economic hardship at home. Iran’s actions threaten the security of nations everywhere. So the United States is strengthening our long-standing security commitments with our friends in the Gulf and rallying friends around the world to confront this danger before it is too late.”

George Bush, once more the warpath, this time in Abu Dhabi, Jan. 15, 2008. Source: The Telegraph

Peace activist Michael Welch, spending the night at the Manitoba Legislature in support of war resisters. Photo: Paul Graham

Halfway through a three-day fast, Winnipeg peace activist Michael Welch is spending his second night under the stars in support of Corey Glass and other US war resisters who have come to Canada rather than fight an immoral war. Tuesday night and part of Wednesday was spent outside the office of Tory MP Joy Smith (Kildonan-St. Paul); Wednesday afternoon and evening on the steps of the Manitoba Legislature.

Michael decided to become actively involved in supporting war resisters last month following the June 3rd vote in Parliament to urge the government to allow war resisters to remain in Canada as permanent residents. When it became evident the government would not follow the advice of Parliament, Michael decided to act, beginning with a sit-in at the office of Tory MP Steven Fletcher (Charleswood–St. James–Assiniboia). Last week he sat in at the office of Rod Bruinooge (Winnipeg South).

While his reception at Tory MP offices has been cordial (with the exception of Bruinooge’s staff, who locked him out when he went outside to speak with reporters), all three MPs continue to toe the government’s anti-war resister line.

Thankfully, the Federal Court is more sensible than the Federal Government. Following its July 4th decision to order the Immigration and Refugee Board to reconsider the failed refugee claim of Joshua Key, the court today granted Corey Glass a stay of removal. While the reasons for the decision have not been issued yet, it reinforces the positive decision in Joshua Key’s asylum case.

However War Resister Robin Long is still being held in jail in Nelson, B.C. and is threatened with deportation to the United States on Monday, July 14th. (See press release.)

July 10th actions are planned across the country to stop the deportation proceedings against Robin Long and let all the war resisters stay.

Prayer Vigil at the Canadian Mennonite University

In Winnipeg, a prayer vigil is planned for noon on July 10. Join Christian Peacemaker Teams in a public prayer vigil to call on Citizenship and Immigration Minister Diane Finley to rescind U.S. war resister Corey Glass’s deportation order, and to let all war resisters stay in Canada.

WHEN: Thursday, July 10, 12:10 – 12:30 pm

WHERE: Canadian Mennonite University, south campus.  600 Shaftesbury Ave., near the food tent (site of Mennonite Church Canada annual conference)

Vigil at “the Leg”

From his lawn chair at the Leg, Michael is helping to organize a vigil that will be held at the Manitoba Legislature, Thursday, July 10, beginning at 8:00 PM. Keynote speakers will include Howard Davidson, a Vietnam-era war resister who has spoken eloquently on the importance of supporting those who refuse to fight wars of aggression.

While war resisters and their supporters have been able to convince the Federal Court that there are grounds to consider the refugee claims of war resisters, we are not home free. Please come out to support war resisters on July 10 and in any other way you can.

This could include writing your MP, Immigration Minister Finley, and Prime Minister Stephen Harper. You can get their addresses here.

The final words go to Michael Welch, recorded on the steps of the Manitoba Legislature, tonight.

(Cross-posted from the website of Peace Alliance Winnipeg.)